KOAH v. ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE [1968] GLR 398. KOAH V ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE [1968] GLR 398. The plaintiff was injured in an accident on 24 June 1965, involving vehicle No . CR 924 in respect of which there was a policy of insurance against third party risks by the defendant insurance company.
11/10/2018 · In Koah v. Royal Exchange Assurance: The plaintiff was awarded damages in an earlier judgment against one Kojo Arku, the named insured and owner of the vehicle, for injuries sustained from an accident negligently caused by one Braima Salaga, the driver of the vehicle at the material time.
11/10/2018 · It was established in Koah v. Royal Exchange Assurance that a person who suffers injury as a result of a vehicular accident can only claim damages from the insurer of the vehicle if the driver of the vehicle at the time of the accident is the person named in the policy or belongs to a defined class of persons named in the policy.
Kisko Products Gh Ltd v . D.A.A. [2001-2002] 1 GLR 368. Koah v . R.E.A. [1968] GLR 398. KOAH v. ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE [1968] GLR 398. Koanda v . Tenassa Pharmaceutical & Trading Co Ltd [2013-2014] 2 SCGLR 1104. Kombia v . Laari & Anor. [1992] 2 GLR 343. Kombia v . Laari & Anor. [1992] 2 GLR 343. Kombia v .Laari & Anor. [1992] 2 GLR 343. Kontor V .
In Koah v Royal Exchange Assurance [1968[GLR 398, it was said that third Derick Ohemeng-Mensah LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS 11 parties not parties to a contract can sue but if and only if and when the contract purports to confer a benefit on that third person.
J.H.S.S. v . Edward Nassar & Co.
Ltd [1971] 1 GLR 205. J.M.T.C.L. v . Williams [1984-86] 1GLR 634. Kessie v . Charmant & Ano. [1973] 2 GLR 194. Kisko Products Gh Ltd v . D.A.A. [2001-2002] 1 GLR 368. KOAH v. ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE [1968] GLR 398. Kwakwa v . Barclays Bank (Gh)Ltd [2003-2005] 1 GLR 224. Nanor v . Auto Parts Ltd [1992] 2 GLR 273.
koah v. ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE Archer J (as he then was) had this to say on the position of privity of contract: “Here in Ghana , the Contracts Act, has changed the law with a fan fare of trumpets and has made it clear that third parties not parties to a contract can sue but if and only if and when the contract purports to confer a benefit on that third party”.
royal exchange assurance Archer J (as he then was) had this to say on the position of privity of contract: “Here in Ghana , the Contracts Act, has changed the law with a fan fare of trumpets and has made it clear that third parties not parties to a contract can sue but if and only if and when the contract purports to confer a benefit on that third party”.
Dewani [1960] 1 All ER 177 268 Koah v. Royal Exchange Assurance [1976] 1 G.L.R. 158 179,181,182 Kores Manufacturing Ltd v . Kolok Manufacturing Ltd [1957] 3 All ER 158 [1958] 2 W.L.R. 858 [1958] 2AUE.R.65 260 Kiell v .
2/7/2020 · STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v VICTORIA ISLAND PROPERTIES AND ANOTHER [2003-2005] 1 GLR 550. WORK IN PROGRESS. Read More ».
